Researchers found 21 people who after completing the 2016 Boston Marathon as charity runners, were willing to almost entirely stop exercising for eight weeks.
The study subjects agreed to exercise less than two hours per week during that time, with no workout to last more than an hour. During marathon training they had averaged almost 32 miles per week, while after the marathon they averaged three to four miles per week. The researchers tested key aspects of their cardiovascular fitness two weeks before the marathon (i.e., at peak training), and repeated the tests four and eight weeks after the marathon.
After four weeks of relative inactivity, the runners had significant drops in blood volume and plasma volume, and the left ventricle of their hearts decreased in mass and thickness. Blood volume decreased by 3.6 percent. These changes can be thought of as the body’s blood-pumping system deteriorating, both in terms of the size and power of the pump (the left ventricle changes) and the resources available to pump (blood and plasma volume). One result would be a given pace feeling harder, because less oxygen would reach working muscles per heart beat than had been the case at the time of their marathon.
During the second four weeks of inactivity, the detraining changes regarding blood volume and the left ventricle stabilised. There were detraining effects in the right ventricle during this time, but, according to lead researcher Charles Pedlar, Ph.D., those changes are mostly of interest to sport cardiologists.
Interestingly, neither the runners’ VO2 max (a measure of maximal aerobic capacity) or total hemoglobin mass (a measure of red blood cells, which carry oxygen to working muscles) declined significantly during the study. (The study notes that red blood cells have an average lifespan of 110 days, or roughly twice as long as this study.)
“Maintaining a small amount of training can offset the losses.” (Allowing some activity probably also helped in finding willing subjects, he acknowledged, and it better captured real-world practices.) Pedlar said that the lack of decline in VO2 max and hemoglobin mass “suggests that with the resumption of training we could see a fairly rapid return to form. Plasma volume can rapidly expand since it is composed mostly of water.”
It’s important to note that this study looked only at some key cardiovascular components of fitness. It didn’t measure many other things that have a significant effect on how fast you are at any given moment, such as capillary density, muscular endurance, or neuromuscular coordination (how well your muscles communicate with your nervous system).
Also, there’s great variability among runners in how soon they feel “off” after not running. Roger Bannister didn’t run for the five days before he became the first person to break 4:00 in the mile. Others feel like they’ve forgotten how to run after a few days off. Because of all these factors, as well as others such as genetics and lifestyle, there’s no one-size-fits-all predictor of lost fitness. Estimates of decreases in endurance performance range from 4 to 25 percent after three to four weeks of no exercise.
Pedlar suggests remaining minimally active, for both fitness and health reasons, even during a purposeful recovery phase. In a recent review of research on how people’s moods changed after voluntarily giving up exercise, the subjects’ anxiety and depressive symptoms began to worsen significantly after two weeks. Our bodies and minds seem to be in sync on this issue – having more than a few weeks of inactivity means forfeiting some of the key benefits of running.